Subject: Re: pkg_summary doesn't indicate PKG_SUFX
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/27/2007 20:51:53
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:44:37PM +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
> : Should we add PKG_SUFX to the pkg_summary(5) in one way or another (maybe
> : add FILENAME field that would include that)?
> Yes, sounds reasonable. Either FILE_NAME (we already have
> FILE_SIZE), or FILENAME; both is fine by me.
I'd prefer if we just add FILE_NAME. The suffix is kind of redundant and
the magic associated with it will die, the pure filename is better.