Subject: Re: Issue with emacs.mk for the first package to use it...
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
Date: 08/08/2007 19:09:31
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 09:52:43AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> But, the whole notion of EMACS_VERSION_MAJOR is itself broken. Is 21
> emacs or xemacs? Is it really reasonable to want 'version 4 or higher
> of IE or netscape', ignoring that they are separately maintained?
> So perhaps instead doxymacs should switch on EMACS_TYPE, adding w3 if
> the type is in an allowed list.
Exactly my thought.