Subject: Re: Enabling checkperms for PKG_DEVELOPER?
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: 07/31/2007 09:40:05
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:24:20 +0200
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
| OK, I've overriden the check in libkver as well. I've tried hard to
| think about the cyclic dependencies and only digest <-> checkperms hit
OK, now (with your last DESTDIR fix as well) it all seems to be working fine
for me, automatically (without needing to explicitly reference checkperms
in pkg_comp's config file - which is as it should be).
It didn't work for me using a binary package I built last Friday, but does
now - both when compiling from source, and then from a clean sandbox
using a binary package. The latter suggests that the binary package now
is different than it was before (I have no idea how, I did not keep the
old one - it looked OK from a quick glance, it contained bin/checkperms,
but that wasn't being installed in the sandbox, even though the pkg db
thought it had been). That suggests to me that perhaps a revbump should
have accompanied the most recent update.