Subject: Re: Enabling checkperms for PKG_DEVELOPER?
To: Juan RP <email@example.com>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: 07/26/2007 16:52:58
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:52:39 +0200
From: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
| On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:22:53 +0200
| Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com> wrote:
| > I'm considering the commit the local patch that CHECK_PERMS=yes
| > automatically adds a real (bootstrap) dependency on checkperms (the
| > package, very small) and therefore that building with
| > PKG_DEVELOPER=yes requires that this package. Is it acceptable for
| > others or do I have to consider more arcane ways to get it?
| It's ok for me... I use it in all machines that I have PKG_DEVELOPER
I had never head of it before (until package builds started failing).
[I am mor ethan a year behind on NetBSD list e-mail ...]
I use pkg_comp, which defaults PKG_DEVELOPER set - the effect is that
(almost) all pkg_comp users now need this package installed. Something
needs to automate that (much the way the requirement for digest is automated)
whenever PKG_DEVELOPER is set. Simply assuming that packages will
be installed is not the right way.