Subject: Re: Loudly ignoring mtree specs in packages
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Johnny C. Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/23/2007 10:45:10
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> now that packages by default don't contain mtree specs, I would like to
> start disabling the mtree code in pkg_add as well and make it print a
> warning. Reasoning is that most cases never cared about it and it means
> that pkg_add is one step closer to being standalone.
I don't think *any* package actually used a custom mtree file. Since
tar took care of creating any directories for us anyway, I agree that we
don't really need to run it for any binary packages that we have
created, even those created a long, long time ago.
> The change does two things:
> (a) Always print a warning when the package contains a mtree specification.
This is good... we should at least note when we have something we
weren't expecting anymore.
> (b) Always keep the mtree spec around (currently removed after use).
Where would we keep this file around after the binary package is unpacked?
-- Johnny Lam <email@example.com>