Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Platform support
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 07/22/2007 10:05:17
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Louis Guillaume <lguillaume@berklee.edu> wrote:
=20
> Maybe there needs to be a threshold of certain mandatory packages being
> built for a platform to be considered supported. But there should be
> something measurable.

And looky here, we did do this dance a while ago:

http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/othersrc/bootstrap-pkgsrc/files/Attic/b=
enchmarks
=20
> > another thing is that i can pretty much guarantee that the list will
> > bitrot within a year because nobody will keep it in sync with reality.

And of course Lubomir is correct, too. :-/

-Jan

--=20
42

--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGo45NfFtkr68iakwRAvXZAKCeadxxp0N2L/drZ40tEQF/nMXoEQCgnnL0
sKKz13rhG7kl6inGwoVF1Cg=
=J/zb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--