Subject: Re: logo?
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <email@example.com>
Date: 07/16/2007 16:22:25
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:43:48 +0200 (CEST)
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I've had a look at the current logo suggestions by Chris Wareham and
> Thomas Bieg. They both have the "cube" (package) idea, but IMHO that
> idea is more obvious in the former than in the latter images:
> The "building" idea in the latter suggestion is nice, but I doubt many
> people that don't know pkgsrc will get that point.
When they work it out they'll get an "Oh Wow" moment - the world
needs things that trigger those moments.
FWLIW I prefer the appearance of Thomas Bieg's design too, no
reasoning it just looks nicer to me.
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see