Subject: Re: how to satisfy build requirement for libXext.so
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
Date: 07/15/2007 01:48:25
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 01:43:11AM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 06:23:33PM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > > BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD.libXext= build
> > > .include "../../x11/libXext/buildlink3.mk"
> > Just a question -- which package does so? I've stumpled over a bunch of
> I do not know where I saw this before. Until now I always included
> mk/x11.buildlink3.mk for X but this may not be correct anymore,
> hence the question whether the above is the recommended new way to
> depend on X (libraries).
I meant specifically a build dependency of libXext, not including it in
> The package which made me ask the question is multimedia/dvdauthor.
> There is a test for some function in ImageMagick which fails because
> linking to libXext does not work. The program does not need X at run
Just check if it links against libX11. If it does, also add a direct
dependency on that. If not, just go on with above.