Subject: Re: Publishing code and VCSs
To: NetBSD Packages Technical Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Adam Hamsik <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/10/2007 20:15:07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> Adam Hamsik wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>>> Anyway, the boost surgery we are talking about is, I think,
>>> trivial. The current Makefiles already allow building a library
>>> individually (see boost-python), so adding packages for every
>>> binary library is a fairly easy task. As a result, we'd get
>>> finer-grained dependencies, which is a good thing in my eyes. (A
>>> while ago we discussed that such things should be achieved by
>>> being able to generate many different binary packages from a
>>> single source one, but we are not there yet.)
>> Can we use option.mk framework for this ? or we are going to
>> create ton of new packages :). e.g boost-python can be boost
>> builded withoption -* python default option can be *. Does this
>> make sense or not :)?
> No, this is poor usage of the options framework. We want library
> packages to not have these types of "options" or else one wouldn't
> be able to depend on a library package having been built with the
> correct set of options or dependencies.
You are right :)
> Splitting the various shared libraries from Boost into smaller
> boost-* packages is a worthwhile thing to do. The scope of Boost
> has certainly broadened from the start of the project when it was
> mostly just a repository for additional template code to augment
> the STL. Losing some of the run-time dependencies for Boost would
> be helpful for packages that use smaller parts of the Boost
> collection of libraries.
> Julio, please go ahead and split the packages as you see fit.
> -- Johnny Lam <email@example.com>
Proud NetBSD user.
We program to have fun.
Even when we program for money, we want to have fun as well.
~ Yukihiro Matsumoto
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----