Subject: Re: Publishing code and VCSs
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Adam Hamsik <email@example.com>
Date: 07/10/2007 17:05:21
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Jul 10, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
>> Now that you bring that up... we'd shorten boost's build times a
>> lot by splitting each binary library in its own package. It
>> should be fairly trivial, but when I proposed it people seemed to
>> dislike the idea :-(
> IIRC the monotone folks worked on getting rid of boost altogether,
> which I'd prefer over surgery on boost.
that would be great, because I see only problem with monotone and
it's boost :). I thought also about git (it's pure C no python and no
c++:) everyone who use it say only good about it's performance (Yes I
know that git has horrible interface).
>> BTW, extatic? What was the correct word? ;-)
> Extatic? Hyped-up? I don't care. :)
> - Hubert
Proud NetBSD user.
We program to have fun.
Even when we program for money, we want to have fun as well.
~ Yukihiro Matsumoto
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----