Subject: Re: bumping revisions for dependent packages
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Klaus Heinz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/16/2007 23:55:04
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > Am I supposed to bump the revision of those packages?
> The Pkgsrc Guide says:
> "PKGREVISION must also be incremented when dependencies have ABI
> Did the ABI change?
The suffix of shared libraries in the old package was .so.10.0.7 and is
now .so.10.0.8 in the updated package.
There is an additional header file "wand/deprecate.h".
There are differences between the header files of version 220.127.116.11
and 18.104.22.168: C++ template changes, function signatures, C++ namespace
There is also a comment from Thomas Klausner in the CVS log for
ImageMagick/Makefile from 2002:
According to the ImageMagick developers, it is uncommon for any two
libMagick.so libraries to be API compatible, and they don't want to
handle proper ELF versioning, but have the "real" version number in
the library. To spare us the pkgsrc maintenance nightmare, follow their
example. Bump PKGREVISION.