Subject: Re: The future of MAKE_JOBS
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Blair Sadewitz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/13/2007 14:27:48
IMHO building different packages concurrently is a better use of
resources--not to mention a worthier design goal--than MAKE_JOBS_SAFE.
If nothing else, MAKE_JOBS_SAFE always entails reliance on
third-party software and/or makefiles, which by definition implies
that it will never be as useful for bulk builds as concurrent package
builds could (will) be.