Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Removal candidates for Gnome 1 cleanup
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com>
From: Zafer Aydogan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/06/2007 10:56:46
i'm using icewm-imlib that still depends on imlib1 and uses gtk1.
It would be great to link icewm-imlib against imlib2
2007/5/6, Thomas Klausner <email@example.com>:
> Please take a look at the following list of packages and let me know
> if you are still using one or more of the following packages.
> The list should contain all packages that depend on the by now very
> old gnome-libs package, one of the core packages of Gnome 1.
> Gnome 2 is rather mature by now and Gnome 1 is unsupported, so I'd
> like to get rid of most (if possible all) Gnome 1 packages sometime
> soon now.
> devel/GConf (replaced by GConf2)
> devel/anjuta (pulled in via gnome-build, perhaps
> gnome-build should be updated or
> removed here)
> devel/bonobo (replaced by libbonobo)
> devel/eel (replaced by eel2)
> devel/libglade (replaced by libglade2)
> finance/gnucash-gtk1 (replaced by gnucash)
> graphics/gdk-pixbuf-gnome (included in gtk2)
> graphics/librsvg (replaced by librsvg2)
> math/guppi (obsolete)
> net/soup (replaced by libsoup-devel)
> print/gnome-print (replaced by libgnomeprint)
> sysutils/gnome-vfs (replaced by gnome-vfs2)
> wm/sawfish (gtk2 version in wip/sawfish-gtk2)
> www/gtkhtml (replaced by gtkhtml38 and gtkhtml314)
> x11/control-center (replaced by gnome2-control-center)
> Additionally, I'd like to drop optional Gnome 1 support in:
> chat/bitchx (gtk option; error?)
> editors/xemacs-current (gnome option)
> graphics/gimp1-base (gimp1-helpbrowser option)
> wip/avahi (gtk option; error?)
> P.S.: tech-pkg cc'd, but reply-to set to pkgsrc-users.