Subject: Re: Packages removals for 2006Q4
To: Joerg Sonnenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mark Davies <email@example.com>
Date: 12/20/2006 11:38:03
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 05:19, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> They did a second release of a GPL version. With that, I would
> suggest to be make an updated ghostscript-afpl the default, rename
> it to ghostscript and keep the old version for compat reasons. Does
> that sound ok with the rest?
I have an ghostscript-gnu package that is updated to the latest
version that I didn't get around to committing before the freeze.
Its basically a copy of the ghostscript-afpl package with distfile and
master_sites adjusted for the gpl version and re-adding the x11
option that the gnu version had.