Subject: Re: Packages removals for 2006Q4
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
Date: 12/19/2006 16:19:39
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Is there something that we can make 'the' ghostscript, or has this really
> split into two concurrent packages? (i.e.: *I* don't want to bother with
> the details and just want 'a' working gs, and I don't care which one it
Three packages, in fact. The ESP version is specialised for CUPS.
Whether or not using the AFPL version is ok is a license question.