Subject: Re: package categories
To: None <email@example.com>
From: George Georgalis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/06/2006 22:16:56
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:48:08PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>Adding tool suppport for renamed packgaes isn't impossible, just
>work. But until it's done, I think we should rename packages only
>when their current names are downright broken.
Definitely easier than "impossible" -- I only used that word with
hope someone would take it as a challenge. Bug-free "tool suppport
for renamed packgaes" would be tough, and probably not worth the
effort. So, I agree, given dependency issues, probably best to
keep packages, which have dependencies, where they are.
That said, a category called science seems appropriate, even if
math and biology remain as more specific sciences. Other than
is there any doc or definition on what the categories mean?
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <IXOYE><