Subject: Re: Updating Zope to 2.9.4
To: Takahiro Kambe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Douglas Wade Needham <email@example.com>
Date: 08/18/2006 09:44:58
I would agree. I had something in the works for 2.8 and 2.8, along
with packages breaking out the bits and pieces for Plone and some
other addons, using a version mechanism similar to what one sees in
python and several other similiar packages. Unfortunately, the past
year had me dedicating a considerable amount of time to my Dad as his
health declined, and what I had was never quite ready for including in
pkgsrc (though I run it on at least one of my servers, and did make at
least one version available for dl from my web site). I plan on
getting back to this in the next week or so, if it is still needed,
after I update my systems to 3.0.1.
Quoting Takahiro Kambe (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> In message <email@example.com>
> on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:44:51 -0400,
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > I have made a package for Zope 2.9.4. At the moment I have it under
> > > www/zope29. Should I commit it like that or should I replace
> > > www/zope25 like 2.6 did?
> > No response so I will go ahead and add zope29. If the PTB wants to
> > change it then can do so.
> I think that intutive zope29 directory is better.
> Takahiro Kambe <email@example.com>
Douglas Wade Needham - KA8ZRT UN*X Consultant & UW/BSD kernel programmer
Disclaimer: My opinions are my own. Since I don't want them, why
should my employer, or anybody else for that matter!