Subject: Re: making 'make replace' safer
To: Peter Schuller <email@example.com>
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/17/2006 13:24:59
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:06:35 +0200
Peter Schuller <email@example.com> wrote:
> But then the question becomes what language people consider acceptable. If
> it's REALLY REALLY a huge sticking point I *might* be convinced to do it in
> C/C++, but I would *so much* prefer not to. The prime candidate at the moment
> would be Ruby, which seems fairly accepted over in the FreeBSD camp (what
> with portupgrade and such).
One consideration - the more common the language the more chance
you have of getting sent patches.
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see