Subject: Re: New category for revision control tools and programs
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 07/14/2006 19:23:51
--TSjqTFuQ28AYToVG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:13:09AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I object to a new category, and believe that the test for adding new
> categories should be more like
>=20
>   "Is the lack of the proposed category a real problem that outweighs
>   the added grief of updating with tools that don't understand package
>   renaming"
>=20
> than
>=20
>   "Are there enough programs to justify a category"

i concur.  i think the benefit (if there is any) is far outweight by
lost history and meaningless work with reimporting stuff.

if you have time to waste, please do something useful instead.

thanks,
regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--TSjqTFuQ28AYToVG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEt9MniwjDDlS8cmMRAou1AKCMCzXVROpL6jD5vw2k+cXugdz41gCeK+y7
fFkCg2vyqqU66uLyvG2JofI=
=fjL6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TSjqTFuQ28AYToVG--