Subject: Re: Package with possibly interactive "test" phase
To: None <email@example.com, rillig@NetBSD.org, tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Dieter Baron <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/03/2006 23:04:09
In article <20060703203214.GA10586@britannica.bec.de> email@example.com wrote:
: On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
: > I am currently running an unprivileged bulk build with PKGSRC_RUN_TEST.
If support for INTERACTIVE_STAGE+=test is easy to add, please do so.
Do we want to exclude the package from the bulk build, or just skip
the ``make test''? (I think the latter.)
: I don't think that will really work, since quite a lot of packages have
: additional dependencies for the self test, often not recorded at all.
: We currently have no TEST_DEPENDS either. This makes the interactiveness
: a minor issue :-)
Yes, a TEST_DEPENDS is needed for proper support of the test target.
How much work would it be to add support for this? (Install the
packages listed in TEST_DEPENDS before running test proper, possibly
in a new phase test-depends?)