Subject: Re: Updating Hugs to 200605
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@NetBSD.org>
Date: 07/03/2006 09:25:05
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:59:19AM +0000, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> I've also renamed the binary package from hugs98 to hugs to match the
> directory name. After all, when one looks for the utility, he'll most
> likely search for hugs, not hugs98. Isn't it?
First of all, the file I attached is quite broken due to this rename... but
it is enough to get the general idea of the update.
I also forgot to mention one thing: what about renaming the hugs package
to hugs-base and then add a meta-pkgs/hugs package that depends on all the
tiny bits? This could be consistent with, e.g., subversion or boost.
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@NetBSD.org>