Subject: Re: clisp build fail.
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
From: Paul (NCC/CS). <pts@bom.gov.au>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/22/2006 11:05:29
"Paul (NCC/CS)" wrote:



hey Christos,
don't forget me,

we were just getting somewhere:)

P.








> Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
> > On Jun 20,  3:48pm, pts@bom.gov.au ("Paul (NCC/CS).") wrote:
> > -- Subject: Re: clisp build fail.
> >
> > |
> > | Hi Christos, others,
> > |
> > | it happened again,
> > |
> > | so here it is:
> > |
> > | tracy# cat minitests.output.sparc--netbsdelf
> > | Int f(Int,Int,Int):({1},{2},{3})->{6}
> > | Int f(Int,Int,Int):({1},{2},{3})->{-268441316}
> > | tracy#
> > |
> > |
> > | definately looks problematic!
> > | ideas?
> > |
> > | i'm almost convinced that the machine has a hardware fault.
> > | probably memory.
> > |
> > | i've been getting through builds by going into subdir's
> > | and building little bits at a time. less stress as with a big
> > | build all at once. this strategy has been working.
> > |
> > | but with clisp it doesn't get past configure and i can't go
> > | subdir configuring. it doesn't work.
> > |
> > | any ideas how i might be able to configure clisp a bit at a
> > | time so as to nurse it through?
> > |
> >
> > Or it could be a compiler error. Is this on a sparc 5?
>
> YES :).
>
> other stuff is compiling now.
> hardware fault is looking less likely.
>
> is there a known bug in compiler on ss5?
> how to fix?
>
> thanks,
> Paul
> :)
>
> >
> >
> > christos
>
> --
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> Paul
> Australian Bureau Of Meteorology
> ____________________________________________
>
> "In a world without walls and fences,
> who needs windows and gates ?"

--

____________________________________________

Paul
Australian Bureau Of Meteorology
____________________________________________




$ cd /pub
$ more beer