Subject: Re: pkg_chk changes to show pkgsrc directory
To: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
Date: 06/14/2006 22:51:44
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> FreeBSD's portversion does:
> < for older
> > installed version is newer (such as testing or out-of-date pkgsrc)
> ? unknown
> A man page is here
> FreeBSD's pkg_version is similar:
> % pkg_version
> Hermes <
> a2ps-letter <
> % pkg_version -v
> Hermes-1.3.2 < needs updating (port has 1.3.3_2)
> a2ps-letter-4.13_1 < needs updating (port has 4.13b_3)
> And "-l" can be used to only list matching status flags.
> I could upgrade the following is:
> pkg_version -l '<'
> So my suggestion is to use a "<".
> devel/readline - readline-5.0 < readline-5.1pl1nb1
> (Including category is good too.)
Right now pkg_chk does not have the logic to determine if a package
version is larger, just different, so it would _always_ use '<' in
a case of mismatch.
So, we have messages of the form: (the last one is only with -B)
devel/readline - readline-5.0 < readline-5.1pl1nb1
devel/readline - readline-5.0 < readline-5.1pl1nb1 (binary package available)
devel/readline - readline-5.1pl1nb1 missing
devel/readline - readline-5.1pl1nb1 build_version mismatch
I'm undecided as to whether the missing should be
devel/readline - missing readline-5.1pl1nb1
instead, or maybe put the MISSING in caps, as in the other cases the
first version shown is the installed version.
Final call to the peanut gallery :)
David/absolute -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --