Subject: Re: Names of the patch files
To: Georg Schwarz <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
Date: 04/19/2006 12:38:24
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Georg Schwarz wrote:
> Am 19.04.2006 um 11:45 schrieb Masao Uebayashi:
>> How about having a single patch file like Debian does?
> separate files are probably easier to maintain
If you are generating patches with mkpatches it would not make
a great deal of difference.
I'd prefer a single file, providing we have a good tool for
splitting it out and merging it back together.
David/absolute -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --