Subject: Re: Adding to BUILD_INFO_FILE: DATE, CATEGORIES, MAINTAINER,
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/08/2006 10:25:45
Replying to two emails:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Alan Barrett wrote:
> > I like ISO 8601 format: "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z". (OK, strictly speaking
> > ISO 8601 wants a literal "T" between the date and the time, but that's
> > too ugly for me.)
> Using ISO 8601 seems fine. I would vote for using it as is
> (%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S %z) but omitting the T would also be acceptable.
I already adjusted mine to use this (without the "T"). Thanks for the
emails about this.
But now this following email suggests:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 email@example.com wrote:
> Use either of the following formats from the HTTP RFC please :-)
> (1) Sun, 06 Nov 1994 08:49:37 GMT (from RFC 822)
> (2) Sun Nov 6 08:49:37 1994 (ANSI ctime(3) format)
Do you care if we use the format above instead?
Jeremy C. Reed
echo ':6DB6=88>?;@69876tA=AC8BB5tA6487><' | tr '4-F' 'wu rofIn.lkigemca'