Subject: Re: databases/gnome-mime-data missing a dependancy
To: None <darcy@NetBSD.org>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/21/2006 15:56:32
On 21/02/2006, at 15:49, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:47:50 +0100
> email@example.com wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:46:18PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>>> This package would not build until I built textproc/p5-XML-
>>> Parser. Not
>>> sure if it should be DEPENDS or BUILD_DEPENDS. I will add it as a
>>> DEPENDS for now. If that is wrong, go ahead and reduce it to
>> Can you please give some details about how this fails for you?
>> I'm not convinced it is really necessary, esp. as run time
> Yes, I am not sure that it is a runtime dependency but I don't know
> package well enough to be sure. Here is the output of the build.
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o
> root -g
> wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> Unknown `--run' option Try
> --help' for more information configure: WARNING: `missing' script is
> too old or missing checking for gawk... /usr/bin/awk checking whether
> make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for i386--netbsdelf-strip... no
> checking for strip... strip
> checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of
> no checking for perl... /usr/pkg/bin/perl
> checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module
> is required for intltool *** Error code 1
> So it fails the configure step. The failure implies that the package
> requires the module.
> I haven't made committed the change yet. I will wait for further
Can you please paste the full log of a 'make configure' after doing
a 'make clean'?
> By the way, would this kind of change require a PKGREVISION bump?
Yes if it was kept as a DEPENDS, because the resulting binary package
would be different (an extra dependency).
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/