On Monday 20 February 2006 01:30, Simon Burge wrote:

> Ah, I understand this now.  Given that you're looking at the newer
> digikam, is it work patching the .po files as you suggest, or should
> I know worry about this?

Well the updated digikam is now in pkgsrc HEAD so fixing the .po files on the 
branch for the remainder of its lifetime is entirely up to you.

cheers
mark