Subject: Re: problems building psi
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/31/2006 20:07:21
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:34:21 -0500
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:

> # cd /usr/pkgsrc/chat/psi
> # cvs -q update -P -d
> # make checksum
> ===> Checking for vulnerabilities in psi-0.10nb1
> => Checksum SHA1 OK for psi-0.10/psi-0.10.tar.bz2.
> => Checksum RMD160 OK for psi-0.10/psi-0.10.tar.bz2.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_zh.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_zh.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_nl.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_nl.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_sk.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_sk.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_fr.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_fr.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_cs.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_cs.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_de.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_de.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_et.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_et.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_pl.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_pl.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_mk.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_mk.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_el.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_el.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_es.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_es.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_ru.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_ru.qm.
> => Checksum SHA1 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_vi.qm.
> => Checksum RMD160 mismatch for psi-0.10/psi_vi.qm.
> 
> 
> Should I send-pr?  (Yes, I cleaned out the offending files and 
> refetched.)  This is from pkgsrc head.

They modified the files again? GRRR.

Try to do "make distclean" and "make checksum" again. If the
checksums are not ok, we should look for changes on them
and update distinfo.