Subject: Re: package directory naming (and renaming devel/swig to devel/swig11)
To: Dieter Baron <>
From: Thomas Klausner <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/12/2006 18:46:06
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >   Is swig-1.1 still needed at all?
> At least gnucash needs it.

I checked this -- gnucash didn't really need it any longer,
so I replaced the swig-1.1 package with the swig-1.3 one.

Another question: Why do we have swig and swig-build?
Doesn't the latter suffice?