Subject: Re: package directory naming (and renaming devel/swig to devel/swig11)
To: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 01/06/2006 15:36:56
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:44:30AM +0100, Dieter Baron wrote:
> any objections if I rename devel/swig to devel/swig11? It is highly
> irritating that the unversioned package directory a historical (and
> for Perl unusable) release.
No, please do that.
> Is swig-1.1 still needed at all?
At least gnucash needs it.