Subject: Re: package directory naming (and renaming devel/swig to devel/swig11)
To: Dieter Baron <>
From: Thomas Klausner <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 01/06/2006 15:36:56
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:44:30AM +0100, Dieter Baron wrote:
> any objections if I rename devel/swig to devel/swig11?  It is highly
> irritating that the unversioned package directory a historical (and
> for Perl unusable) release.

No, please do that.

>   Is swig-1.1 still needed at all?

At least gnucash needs it.