Subject: package directory naming (and renaming devel/swig to devel/swig11)
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
Date: 01/05/2006 11:44:30
any objections if I rename devel/swig to devel/swig11? It is highly
irritating that the unversioned package directory a historical (and
for Perl unusable) release.
Is swig-1.1 still needed at all?
On a broader note, could we please set and document a policy on how
to name package directories if more than one version of a program is
in pkgsrc? Including on how to handle adding the second version
(e. g. renaming the original unversioned package).