Subject: Re: building different package names from PKG_OPTIONS
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/16/2005 21:25:17
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> You didn't mention the impact of this on binary packages.
> Which is the main one, and will affect probably the whole dependency
> handling, at least to a good bit.
> How do you intend to specify "depend on apache WITH/WITHOUT su-exec" (or
Maybe admins could keep some packages.conf that defines the options they
need. Then a smart pkg_add can look there when making choices for
dependencies before downloading and installing.
I see a few different people are working on package administration
interfaces. I need to start playing with some of them.
Jeremy C. Reed
BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links