Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Package removal candidates
To: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
From: Jim Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/06/2005 12:58:24
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Dieter Baron wrote:
> How about this: as an interim fix (so these packages work on the
>upcoming 2005Q4), commit the change above, and take up this issue with
>the authors of java-vm.mk (with CC: to tech-pkg)?
Actually, how about this: since the package as is builds fine for
anyone with a properly configured environment, I will leave it as is.
Plenty of people are building it and using it as it is now, so I don't
see any reason it should change.
If people are worried about the bulk build environment not being able to
build this package (and apparently, people are, since we're talking
about deleting perfectly working packages to make the bulk build reports
look nicer), _they_ can take this up with the authors of java-vm.mk.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----