Subject: Re: pkg_chk for remote binary packages
To: Dieter Baron <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 12/06/2005 17:24:19
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Dieter Baron wrote:
>> I see... is the format of this file documented somehow?
> It's simply lines of the format
> which is the format used internally by pkg_chk.
First, that does not answer the question about documentation (see "others
may use the file, too").
What is the "directory" here - the same as the pkg's directory in pkgsrc,
as in pkgsrc/category/directory? Makes me wonder why that is needed, as
it's not used in the dependency system (and neither is the category).
I wonder why this can't be generated on demand, e.g. by running "ls -lR"
or so, see pkg_install, which does not require the burden of maintaining
such a file.
>> ISTR there used to be a "make index" which created something similar that
>> was (is?) used on FreeBSD for package downloads by their installer.
>> Having only one such file around may make things a lot easier, and given
>> that iMil's working on a very similar feature, working with him on the
>> format of that file would probably be good.
> Indeed, as would be working with Jeremy's index generation. But
> that takes time, and this patch works *now*. I would like to have
> that feature in the 2005Q4 branch. We can always migrate pkg_chk to
> use the common format once it is fixed.
>> As well as (of course) documenting its existance and format for future
>> tools, which will likely pop up and use that file.
> It is rather pkg_chk specific. For future tools, using Jeremy's
> file format is probably better. Documenting the file's format and
> name in the pkg_chk man page is a good idea, though.
If you already know that there's a better alternative, it may be good to
go that way...