Subject: Re: proposal of how to deal with missing header files supplied by nbcompat
To: Roland Illig <rillig@NetBSD.org>
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/02/2005 21:00:49
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:52:51PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> One thing I'm not quite sure is how to name the variables.
> LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED is not the worst choice, but that name alone doesn't
> tell _what_ is needed. If I said LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED=yes, this would also
> sound reasonable. So I prefer LIBNBCOMPAT_NEEDED_FEATURES, even if that
> name is a little longer. Same for NCURSES_NEEDED_FEATURES.
Does that make any difference?
Better might be
where xxx and yyy are functions that (it is known) have to come from
At least then you might have half a clue as to what doesn't work where.
David Laight: email@example.com