Subject: Re: Proposed audit-packages changes
To: Johnny C. Lam <jlam@pkgsrc.org>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 11/22/2005 12:24:54
--QnBU6tTI9sljzm9u
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:24:56AM +0000, Johnny C. Lam wrote:
> The attached patch implements the alternative I describe above.  The
> audit-packages build dependency is pulled in and built automatically
> if CHECK_VULNERABILITIES is "yes".  This causes the default pkgsrc
> setup to behave exactly like the old behavior except that we use
> audit-packages instead of standalone audit code to perform the
> vulnerability checks.  It also allows the current
> ALLOW_VULNERABILITIES.<pkgbase> functionality added by <erh> to
> continue to work.  I think this is the best of both worlds, so this
> should be the way to go.

sounds good to me.

regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--QnBU6tTI9sljzm9u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDgwAGiwjDDlS8cmMRAi0ZAJwKVWQyDgGcS9Bsrum+tXYRcVQw3gCgjEcc
LzBorTz02lCnHD18qL9RAkA=
=2qBZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QnBU6tTI9sljzm9u--