Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/scamper
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Dieter Baron <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/03/2005 01:10:35
> > If we really want support for required options, I can add explicit
> > support for this to the options framework (via the new variable
> > PKG_OPTIONS_REQUIRED_OPTIONS, for example).
> That would be a nice addition. However, there's still the PKG_FAIL vs.
> PKG_SKIP difference to worry about.
Why would you rather set PKG_SKIP than PKG_FAIL? Would you prefer
PKG_SKIP over PKG_FAIL for empty required groups as well? If not,
what is the distinctive difference?