Subject: Re: Renaming audio/musicpd to audio/mpd ?
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/19/2005 06:47:50
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:30:50AM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
[ about the package that used to be called musicpd ]
> In this case, it'll collide with a program that is documented everywhere
> in the documentation (and in the internal building system) as being called
Now this package has been deliberately renamed despite of the above
discussion to not only conflict in the installed program (and other files')
names, but also in the package name - isn't this bad because of conflicting
binary package names?
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/