-On [20051003 14:56], segv@netctl.net (segv@netctl.net) wrote:
>Maybe that's because you can have chains of dependancies:
>
>A->B->C->D
>
>So A depends on B, which depends on C, which depends on D
>To update A, you'd have to remove D, C, B in this order and rebuild them.

Wouldn't it be better to do:

build D, deinstall D, install D,
build C, deinstall C, install C,
et cetera?

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://www.andf.info/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/ | catcher@in-nomine.org
Certum est quia impooibile est...