Subject: Re: SDL and lack of mk/x11.buildlink3.mk
To: Tom Spindler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Adam <email@example.com>
Date: 10/01/2005 11:18:55
> Currently, devel/SDL/Makefile.common doesn't include mk/
> but instead relies upon aalib-x11 (!?) to include it by proxy; this
> seems less than optimal, especially if SDL were to be moved to the
> options framework and aalib-x11 were to be disabled.
> Is there some reason (perhaps for the Cocoa/Darwin) case that the x11
> buildlink file ought not to be included?
Correct. On Mac OS X, x11 should not be included, nor MesaLib (SDL
uses OpenGL framework).
I would like to see a proper OpenGL handing in pkgsrc. :|