--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:42:21PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:17:02AM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> >=20
> > >>>see subject. I've sent a PR with details, but thought a heads-up
> > >>>should be done given the pending Q3 release.
> > >>
> > >>I found new file has different links-2.1pre18/graphics/font_include.c.
>=20
> I looked myself, and found:
>=20
> -      old         file  has                ./graphics/font_include.c
> - both old and new files have (a different) ./font_include.c

Follow-up:

- Apparently, 2.1pre18 compiles the ./font_include.c one, and works fine
  with that
- ./font_include.c is the same in 2.1pre18 and 2.1pre17

While this might be a mistake on the links' maintainers' side, I think
we can savely use the new version for the time being, and wait for 2.1pre19.

Should I commit the new checksum?

Regards,
	-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/

--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDPSjPN4tiz3B8hB0RAqccAJ4we5bPBgKU3p7c/aCh5VVkjNejMgCgnl8c
0Re6wsgHEgbSRcJUQNsL5+4=
=GZSW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ--