Subject: re: printing with acroread7 and cups
To: Quentin Garnier <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/04/2005 04:05:40
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 03:13:41PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> i wonder if the problem is better solved by making compat_linux less
> invasive. does linux_sys_mkdir() need to create dirs in the emul
> path? looking at sys/compat/linux i would almost say that there are
> a number of syscalls that do translation that shouldn't. not sure that
> files should be created here (open/creat). not sure about mknod() but
> this one might be known best this way. rename() seems wrong. symlink()
> and link() also seem wrong. and those are just the ones in linux_file.c.
> i'm suspicious of any compat syscalls *creating* things inside the
> emul dir... ie, any use of CHECK_ALT_CREAT().
Installing an additional RPM?
in that case we should call rpm with --root /emul/linux.