Subject: Re: Building an accurate dependency tree - how?
To: None <joerg@britannica.bec.de, gavan@coolfactor.org>
From: Gilles Dauphin <Gilles.Dauphin@enst.fr>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/11/2005 18:03:43
> Delivered-To: dauphin@enst.fr
> X-Original-To: tech-pkg@netbsd.org
> Delivered-To: tech-pkg@netbsd.org
> From: Gavan Fantom <gavan@coolfactor.org>
> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> To: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
> Cc: tech-pkg@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Building an accurate dependency tree - how?
> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at enst.fr
> 
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:40:26PM +0200, Peter Schuller wrote:
> > 
> >>   converters/libiconv devel/zlib x11/fixesext

add the following:
	
x11/Xfixes
x11/xextensions

Gilles


> > At least the former two are normally builtins and the latter should be a
> > builtin if your system already has X11 installed. I'm not sure myself
> > why they are used, I find it a bit annoying that they are installed.
> > Some of the pkgsrc devs can shed more light on this, I guess :-)
> 
> If they are installed needlessly, that's an annoyance. If they are 
> installed *and not registered*, that's a problem.
> 
> -- 
> Gillette - the best a man can forget