Subject: IPv4/IPv6 in OSS [Was: Re: increase datasize resource limit]
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com>
From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/11/2005 10:22:39
-On [20050811 06:47], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai (email@example.com) wrote:
>That should not be a solution. That's only about IPv4 endpoints being
>addressable through IPv6 addresses (::127.0.0.1, the 0 setting means you
>reenabled them, this is RFC compliant, but security-wise an issue).
>Why do I get the feeling a lot of OSS projects have little clue how to
>properly write applications that use IPv4/IPv6.
Just to make sure my knowledge is not missing anything, the only way to
properly get about this is, as most people think:
You support IPv4 binding, IPv6 binding, and a dual binding on IPv6 where
IPv4 gets mapped to IPv6. The IPv4-mapped-in-IPv6 issue is a controversial
one (see amongst other things Metz & Itojun-san's
draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful as submitted to the IETF).
So why don't most applications just support -4, -6 flags to specify only
IPv4 or IPv6 and bind to both otherwise (and I am not meaning the mapped
Or have I lost my marbles somewhere?
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://www.andf.info/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/
Every person takes the limits for their own field of vision for the
limits of the world...