Subject: Re: March patches re: bin-install
To: J Chapman Flack <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <email@example.com>
Date: 06/24/2005 18:34:21
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, J Chapman Flack wrote:
> 3. given DEPENDS+= foo>=1.2nb2:../../bar/foo
> and the bar/foo Makefile provides 1.2nb3
> even if a 1.2nb2 binary exists, which would satisfy the requirement,
> it is ignored and a source build of 1.2nb3 is done.
Please see my simple idea (patch) in
> The patches are in http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/03/20/0025.html
> More complete explanations and rationale for the changes are in
I will have a look at your ideas too.
> Should I make a PR do you think just to keep them visible? I'm curious if
> anyone sees effects in the patches that look like they would break something
PR tracking system is always a good idea if you are concerned it may be
overlooked or forgotten.
Jeremy C. Reed
BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links