On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 10:46:55AM +1000, grant beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:41:15PM +0200, Andreas_Hallmann wrote:
> 
> > Hi everybody,
> > 
> > trying to bootstrap I found that
> > 
> >  work/libnbcompat/private/utils.h uses  _POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX  which is not defined in nextstep.
> > 
> > It's existence is assumed ...
> > 
> > You can find it in netbsd
> > 
> > /usr/include/limits.h:#define   _POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX      255
> 
> is DUPMAX defined anywhere in nextstep?
> 
> if _POSIX2_RE_DUP_MAX is not defined, it is probably safe to define
> DUPMAX to 255.
> 
> grant.
> 

THanks

Nextstep has a 

/* Maximum number of duplicates an interval can allow.  */
#ifndef RE_DUP_MAX /* kludge for AIX, which defines it */
#define RE_DUP_MAX  ((1 << 15) - 1) 
#endif

in its c++ library headers for Regular expressions. (/usr/include/g++/regex.h)

But DUPMAX 255 seems to be more appropriate.
> 

-- 
NetBSD: If you happen to have any problem with your uptime.