Subject: Re: Some more GNOME 1 candidates for removal
To: Alan Post <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
Date: 06/15/2005 16:11:18
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 13:33 +0000, Alan Post wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> > wm/sawfish
> > wm/sawfish-replibs
> > x11/rep-gtk (removing this one means removing sawfish*)
> I use sawfish, as does at least one of my friends. I really like
> having a programmably extensible window manager. I'd rather use
> something more actively maintained, but scwm is even less maintained,
> AFAICT. If anyone has a suggestion for a more-alive wm that really
> allows you to do whatever you want (i.e. bind arbitrary wm actions to
> arbitrary keys, and maintain internal data structures), I'd love to
> hear about it.
OK, point taken.
> FWIW, here is an assertion that "sawfish is still being developed":
> Is the goal here to remove GNOME1 altogether? I think it is possible
> to build sawfish against GNOME2 -- see the FreeBSD ports "sawfish2"
> and "rep-gtk2".
That would be certainly nice, IMHO.
Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/