Subject: Re: binary bootstrap kits as native packages
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
Date: 06/05/2005 12:10:16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +1000, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> | Has there been any consideration to distributing binary bootstrap kit=
> | in the target platforms native package format? For example MacOS .pk=
> | or Red Hat/Fedora Core's rpm?
> | I do realize that just extracting the kit at / is very easy. However=
> | just goes that little bit more to allow pkgsrc tools to be installed=
> | almost without thought or instructions.
> I think this is a good idea, as is providing "native" binary packages
> for non-NetBSD platforms that have been built from source with pkgsrc.
> It would go greatly to expanding the appeal of pkgsrc-built-binaries
> on those other platforms.
Something like a 'make native-package'? I'm not sure, but wouldn't this
entail pkgsrc understanding and becoming compatible with other package
managers in order to be able to accurately construct the proper
dependencies and all?
I understand that it'd be nice for the bootstrap packages, but then
again, we've been meaning to pkgify bootstrap properly for a while, so
that it would register as a regular (pkgsrc-style) package, which I
think would then obsolete the need for native format packages somewhat.
``Life is too short to stay entirely sober.'' -- Chuck Swiger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----