Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/www/galeon
To: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Dieter Baron <email@example.com>
Date: 05/31/2005 18:37:40
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:27:03PM +0000, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 18:08 +0200, Dieter Baron wrote:
> > In article <20050531154356.389442DA27@cvs.netbsd.org> Matthias wrote:
> > : Log Message:
> > : let this use the renderer from "firefox" or "mozilla-gtk2", depending
> > : on the GECKO_PROVIDER option
> > Could you please use the options framework for this? We are
> > currently deprecating selecting build options via variables like the
> > one you just introduced.
> I think this usage of a variable, GECKO_PROVIDER, is correct. ATM, the
> package options framework doesn't make much sense with mutually
> exclusive possibilites; unless your proposal on the other mail
> progresses ;)
Which I certainly hope it does. There are quite a number of
packages that use the options framework and have mutually-exclusive
GECKO_PROVIDER is exactly the kind of option
PKG_OPTIONS_REQUIRED_CLASS is meant to handle.
> (BTW, how do you define a pkgsrc-wide default value for an "options"
> group? I.e., be gecko-firefox the default for everything.)
just like any other option too.