Subject: Re: Smarter make update / pkg_chk algo
To: Martin S. Weber <Ephaeton@gmx.net>
From: Rhialto <email@example.com>
Date: 05/06/2005 01:00:19
On Wed 04 May 2005 at 10:11:29 +0200, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> pkg_chk makes the process of upgrading packages a piece of cake - call the
> script, lean back. While Error, Upgrade, Repeat. So having the packages one
> started out with is easy (even if it might take several invocations of
> pkg_chk, spanning hours, days, weeks ...), yet the time taken to upgrade is
> clearly not minimal. Even if no error occurs, a common flaw of pkg_chk is that
> it sequentially updates outdated packages found, and in the progress often
> compiles packages more often than needed -- i.e. more than *EXACTLY* once.
I tried to avoid this, by building a bunch of binary packages with
pkg_comp and then updating them with pkg_chk -buv... however this fails!
This is what you get:
[ Update ]
/usr/sbin/pkg_delete -K /var/db/pkg aspell
pkg_delete: package `aspell-0.50.5nb3' is required by other packages:
** ' /usr/sbin/pkg_delete -K /var/db/pkg aspell' failed
*** Can only update packages with dependencies via -s
Duh. What good is the -b option (use only binary packages) given the
last line of the diagnostic?
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- rhialto/at/falu.nl
\X/ Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me to your .signature to help me spread!